AMD64 3400+ is faster than Pentium EE?

I just realized that my AMD 6400+ laptop was actually faster than Intel's Pentium Extreme Edition 3.72 GHz CPU after reading the following link:

http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/11/21/the_mother_of_all_cpu_charts_2005/page24.html

Connecting Holux GM-210 GPS Receiver to Laptop

I bought my portable GPS receiver a few years ago. It was designed to connect to my Sony CLIE NX80V PDA. Somehow, since then I almost never used it. Perhaps because it was too cumbersome to put in my card. I thought I could connect to my laptop, but no it couldn't, because the connector is different.

Now, somebody has posted a way to connect it.

http://astro1.panet.utoledo.edu/~igor/GPS2Clie.html

Some Optimization Flags on GCC

Yesterday, I was playing around with some optimizations options supplied by GCC (ver 4.0.2) on my AMD64 laptop. I created a very small code to compute sin(x) * cos (x). As we know, Pentium and newer processors support a FP machine code to compute these two functions simulatenously in single mnemonic code: FSINCOS.

the code is as follow:

#include

inline double fsincos(double x)
{
return sin(x)*cos(x);
}

First, I compiled it to assembly source with no optimization enabled, just using defaults as follow:

> gcc -c -S fsincos.c -o fsincos.s

and then open the generated assembly code in fsincos.s. Overthere I saw somewhere it called internal library functions for sin and cos trigonometry functions as I expected. I then recompiled it with full optimization flags enabled:

> gcc -c -S -mtune=athlon64 -mfpmath=sse -msse3 -ffast-math -m64 -O3 fsincos.c -o fsincos64.s

Suprisingly, it still called GNU's "sin" and "cos" math functions!. What? I said (not loud, though). I checked again the gcc man page, nothing special about these things. Hm....let's try to add "387" in the mfpmath, I said in my mind.

So, the command is now as follow:

gcc -c -S -mtune=athlon64 -mfpmath=387,sse -msse3 -ffast-math -m64 -O3 fsincos.c -o fsincos64.s

Voila! now the assembly code called inline FP code "fsincos" in it. Since then, I add an environment variable in the enviroment as follow:

export CFLAGS="-mtune=athlon64 -mfpmath=387,sse -msse3 -ffast-math -m64"
export CPPFLAGS=$CFLAGS

X86_64 Assembly Nightmare

A few days ago I was trying to compile mpg123 application. It is a command-line MP3 player. I begin with command:

make help

It gave some options. First I tried "make linux", still failed to compile with a bunch of errors. I then tried "make linux-3dnow", or "make linux-3dnow-alsa". All of them failed to compile at some assembly files (*.s). I look at one of the assembly-code files, and saw that the codes were designed for 32bit platform, while my laptop was running x86_64 Suse v10.0 (64-bit Linux). I did change "pushl %ebp" etc. to "push %rbp" etc., the compiled went OK, but when I tried to run the program, it crashed with segmentation fault message.

Hmm...I then went to AMD website and download all the documentation. These PDF documents are huge (each PDF file has more than 300 pages). I started reading one of them. Will post any progress later.

Stay tuned!

64-Bit Power Struggle Heats Up

AMD still is the winner, at least for now.

http://www.eweek.com/print_article2/0,1217,a=167278,00.asp

Xbox 360 mod chips almost available

This is cool! Amazing, these hackers are doing it fast!

Xbox 360 mod chips almost available